Re: SCO's claims seem empty

From: Martin List-Petersen (
Date: Fri Jun 06 2003 - 17:17:57 EST

On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 17:13, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Gwe, 2003-06-06 at 13:31, Martin List-Petersen wrote
> > Besides this article states confirmation on similar code, still i would say: Did
> > it come from Linux orginally or did it come from SCO ?
> >
> >
> If it isn't simply carefully doctored choices designed mislead clueless
> analysts. You are also ignoring at least two other things - code that is
> common because its from the reference (eg intel locking code) and code
> from third party vendors legitimately supplied to both Linux and SCO.

I'm just pushing it here. Of course this code could be from anywhere and that's exactly the point.
Wouldn't wonder me if some code was legitimate both used in Linux and SCO that came from outside.

Martin List-Petersen
martin at list-petersen dot dk

In like a dimwit, out like a light.
                -- Pogo

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to More majordomo info at Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 07 2003 - 22:00:31 EST