Re: [Patch] 2.5.70-bk11 zlib cleanup #3 Z_NULL

From: Linus Torvalds (torvalds@transmeta.com)
Date: Fri Jun 06 2003 - 13:54:45 EST


On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Jörn Engel wrote:
>
> How do you feel about "if (z->state->blocks != NULL)"? Remove the
> pointless !=NULL or keep it?

I don't mind it, but it doesn't buy much.

It's actually in some other cases where I think there is a readability
issue, ie in more complex conditionals I personally prefer the simpler
cersion, ie I much prefer something like

        if (ptr && ptr->ops && ptr->ops->shutdown)
                ptr->ops->shutdown(ptr, xxxx);

over the pointless NULL-masturbation in something like

        if (ptr != NULL && ptr->ops != NULL && ptr->ops->shutdown != NULL)
                ptr->ops->shutdown(ptr, xxxx)

which I just is much less readable than the simple version.

                Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 07 2003 - 22:00:31 EST