Re: [RFC][PATCH 2.5.70] Static tunable semvmx and semaem

From: William Lee Irwin III (wli@holomorphy.com)
Date: Fri Jun 06 2003 - 08:12:38 EST


On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 02:31:35PM +0530, Arvind Kandhare wrote:
> As we have discussed earlier, making it dynamic can cause some race
> conditions in the system
> (Please refer thread "Changing SEMVMX to a tunable parameter" on 28 May
> 2003).

I'm sorry about the confusion. I forgot the earlier thread. Please
disregard my earlier comments wrt. dynamism, as they appear to be in
conflict with other notions.

I think the __setup()'s should be moved to ipc/sem.c; otherwise I think
manfred's the right person to do the review here and I'll back off.

-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 07 2003 - 22:00:30 EST