Re: [PATCH] IDE Power Management, try 2

From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt (
Date: Thu Jun 05 2003 - 09:27:59 EST

> > I had to add yet another rq->flags bit for that, and I think that sucks
> You don't have if you use additional, default pm_state (on == 0).
> This sucks too, but a bit less.

Can you elaborate ? I'm not sure I understand what you meant

> I think extending struct request is the way to go,
> pm_step & pm_state or even pointer to rq_pm_struct.

Ok. I'll wait for Jens ack and go that way if he agrees.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 07 2003 - 22:00:27 EST