Re: [PATCH] IDE Power Management, try 2

From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt (benh@kernel.crashing.org)
Date: Thu Jun 05 2003 - 09:27:59 EST


> > I had to add yet another rq->flags bit for that, and I think that sucks
>
> You don't have if you use additional, default pm_state (on == 0).
> This sucks too, but a bit less.

Can you elaborate ? I'm not sure I understand what you meant

> I think extending struct request is the way to go,
> pm_step & pm_state or even pointer to rq_pm_struct.

Ok. I'll wait for Jens ack and go that way if he agrees.

Ben.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 07 2003 - 22:00:27 EST