Re: size of... (was: lk-changelog.pl 0.124)

From: jw schultz (jw@pegasys.ws)
Date: Wed Jun 04 2003 - 19:58:19 EST

Next message: mingz: "io performance monitoring under linux"
Previous message: Davide Libenzi: "RE: [PATCH] [2.5] Non-blocking write can block"
In reply to: Matthias Andree: "size of... (was: lk-changelog.pl 0.124)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 09:05:53PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> BTW, what is the maximum size that people will bear for linux-kernel
> mails? This damn Perl script has grown damn big...

I think you are very close to the limit.

I'd consider splitting the script up a bit. Put the
%addresses hash into a separate file perhaps. You also
might just post the changlog and diffs.

-- ________________________________________________________________ J.W. Schultz Pegasystems Technologies email address: jw@pegasys.ws

Remember Cernan and Schmitt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: mingz: "io performance monitoring under linux"
Previous message: Davide Libenzi: "RE: [PATCH] [2.5] Non-blocking write can block"
In reply to: Matthias Andree: "size of... (was: lk-changelog.pl 0.124)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 07 2003 - 22:00:25 EST