Re: Linux 2.4.21-rc7

From: Mr. James W. Laferriere (babydr@baby-dragons.com)
Date: Wed Jun 04 2003 - 10:09:33 EST

Next message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: Strange load issues with 2.5.69/70 in both -mm and -bk trees."
Previous message: Timothy Miller: "Coding standards. (Was: Re: [PATCH] [2.5] Non-blocking write can block)"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: Linux 2.4.21-rc7"
Next in thread: Alex Romosan: "Re: Linux 2.4.21-rc7"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello Dave , Thank you for the warning . Now how about why
laymans style ? Tia , JimL

On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 13:14, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > gcc (GCC) 3.3 (Debian)
> > > GNU ld version 2.14.90.0.4 20030523 Debian GNU/Linux
> > That would do it.
> I don't trust anything past gcc-3.2.x on sparc and sparc64.
> Use 3.3.x and later at your own peril.

-- 
       +------------------------------------------------------------------+
       | James   W.   Laferriere | System    Techniques | Give me VMS     |
       | Network        Engineer |     P.O. Box 854     |  Give me Linux  |
       | babydr@baby-dragons.com | Coudersport PA 16915 |   only  on  AXP |
       +------------------------------------------------------------------+
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: Strange load issues with 2.5.69/70 in both -mm and -bk trees."
Previous message: Timothy Miller: "Coding standards. (Was: Re: [PATCH] [2.5] Non-blocking write can block)"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: Linux 2.4.21-rc7"
Next in thread: Alex Romosan: "Re: Linux 2.4.21-rc7"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 07 2003 - 22:00:23 EST