On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 05:39, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 14:32, Russell King wrote:
> > That would not help the case when you have the "generic" bridge module
> > loaded and the specific bridge driver as a loadable module.
> Well... we could store the match score of the driver, and if a newer
> driver comes with a better match, call a replace() callback in the
> current owner to ask if it allows "live" replacement... But that's
> far beyond my original idea though
That is something I was considering also. I'm not sure how big of a
change it would be yet. I started looking at it a little bit on Friday.
-- Mark Haverkamp <email@example.com>
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 07 2003 - 22:00:16 EST