Re: SCO's claims seem empty

From: Marcus Metzler (mocm@metzlerbros.de)
Date: Mon Jun 02 2003 - 06:39:56 EST

Next message: Ed Tomlinson: "Re: 2.5.70-mm3"
Previous message: Con Kolivas: "Assertion failure in 2.5.69-mm9"
In reply to: uaca@alumni.uv.es: "Re: SCO's claims seem empty"
Next in thread: Raimundo Bilbao: "Re: SCO's claims seem empty"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

uaca@alumni.uv.es writes:
> Hello everybody
>
>
> let me speculate what we will see when SCO shows their "assumed proofs"
>
> they will show code of the kernel and they will claim that was previously on
> SCO's operating system (and was made by them without a GPL license),
>
> how to refute that?
>

Actually, you should not need to refute that. Innocent until proven
guilty and all that. They have to prove that it was their code.

Marcus

-- /--------------------------------------------------------------------\ | Dr. Marcus O.C. Metzler | | |--------------------------------|-----------------------------------| | mocm@metzlerbros.de | http://www.metzlerbros.de/ | \--------------------------------------------------------------------/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ed Tomlinson: "Re: 2.5.70-mm3"
Previous message: Con Kolivas: "Assertion failure in 2.5.69-mm9"
In reply to: uaca@alumni.uv.es: "Re: SCO's claims seem empty"
Next in thread: Raimundo Bilbao: "Re: SCO's claims seem empty"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 07 2003 - 22:00:16 EST