Re: [PATCH][LSM] Early init for security modules and various cleanups

From: Andrew Morton (akpm@digeo.com)
Date: Mon Jun 02 2003 - 05:44:19 EST

Next message: Jens Axboe: "Re: 2.4.20: Proccess stuck in __lock_page ..."
Previous message: Andres Salomon: "problem w/ 2.5.70-mm3 and modules"
In reply to: Chris Wright: "Re: [PATCH][LSM] Early init for security modules and various cleanups"
Next in thread: Stephen Smalley: "Re: [PATCH][LSM] Early init for security modules and various cleanups"
Reply: Stephen Smalley: "Re: [PATCH][LSM] Early init for security modules and various cleanups"
Reply: Chris Wright: "Re: [PATCH][LSM] Early init for security modules and various cleanups"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Chris Wright <chris@wirex.com> wrote:
>
> security_capable() returns 0 if that capability bit is set.

That's just bizarre. Is there any logic behind it?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jens Axboe: "Re: 2.4.20: Proccess stuck in __lock_page ..."
Previous message: Andres Salomon: "problem w/ 2.5.70-mm3 and modules"
In reply to: Chris Wright: "Re: [PATCH][LSM] Early init for security modules and various cleanups"
Next in thread: Stephen Smalley: "Re: [PATCH][LSM] Early init for security modules and various cleanups"
Reply: Stephen Smalley: "Re: [PATCH][LSM] Early init for security modules and various cleanups"
Reply: Chris Wright: "Re: [PATCH][LSM] Early init for security modules and various cleanups"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 07 2003 - 22:00:16 EST