Re: [2.5 patch] let USB_GADGET depend on USB

From: Adrian Bunk (
Date: Sun Jun 01 2003 - 06:13:03 EST

On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 04:39:28PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >USB_GADGET is still selectable even with USB disabled. It seems the
> >following is intended:
> This is wrong.
> CONFIG_USB has always represented the master/host side ... while
> CONFIG_USB_GADGET represents just the slave/gadget side.
> The two are completely independent. Hardware that supports
> one will typically _not_ support the other. And systems
> that support the slave/gadget side will have no use at all
> for the 100KB+ of "usbcore".

Well, CONFIG_USB_GADGET without CONFIG_USB gives me the following link
error in 2.5.70-mm3:

<-- snip -->

  LD .tmp_vmlinux1
security/built-in.o(.text+0x246d): In function `find_usb_device':
: undefined reference to `usb_bus_list_lock'
security/built-in.o(.text+0x2481): In function `find_usb_device':
: undefined reference to `usb_bus_list_lock'
security/built-in.o(.text+0x248d): In function `find_usb_device':
: undefined reference to `usb_bus_list'
security/built-in.o(.text+0x2493): In function `find_usb_device':
: undefined reference to `usb_bus_list'
security/built-in.o(.text+0x24b3): In function `find_usb_device':
: undefined reference to `usb_bus_list'
security/built-in.o(.text+0x24ba): In function `find_usb_device':
: undefined reference to `usb_bus_list_lock'
security/built-in.o(.text+0x24c0): In function `find_usb_device':
: undefined reference to `usb_bus_list_lock'
make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1

<-- snip -->

If you disagree with my patch please fix the compilation of



"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to More majordomo info at Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 07 2003 - 22:00:14 EST