Re: [2.5 patch] let USB_GADGET depend on USB

[David Brownell (david-b@pacbell.net)]

Adrian Bunk wrote:
> USB_GADGET is still selectable even with USB disabled. It seems the 
> following is intended:

This is wrong.

CONFIG_USB has always represented the master/host side ... while
CONFIG_USB_GADGET represents just the slave/gadget side.

The two are completely independent.  Hardware that supports
one will typically _not_ support the other.  And systems
that support the slave/gadget side will have no use at all
for the 100KB+ of "usbcore".


If you want CONFIG_USB_GADGET to depend on USB, then you're
going to need to change the meaning of CONFIG_USB so that it
becomes just an "umbrella" ... and change EVERYTHING that
currently depends on CONFIG_USB to depend on some new config
varaible representing just the host side (which also depends
on CONFIG_USB).  That sort of change seems pointless.





> --- linux-2.5.70-mm3/drivers/usb/gadget/Kconfig.old	2003-06-01 00:15:30.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.5.70-mm3/drivers/usb/gadget/Kconfig	2003-06-01 00:15:49.000000000 +0200
> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
>  #
>  menuconfig USB_GADGET
>  	tristate "Support for USB Gadgets"
> -	depends on EXPERIMENTAL
> +	depends on USB && EXPERIMENTAL
>  	help
>  	   USB is a master/slave protocol, organized with one master
>  	   host (such as a PC) controlling up to 127 peripheral devices.
>
>
>
> cu
> Adrian



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/