Re: Properly implement flush_dcache_page in 2.4? (Or is it possible?)

From: Hugh Dickins (hugh@veritas.com)
Date: Sat May 31 2003 - 05:17:22 EST


On Sat, 31 May 2003, Russell King wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 09:33:04AM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > that's a possibility), the "unspecified" would allow that much - but
> > wouldn't allow you to show portions of entirely other files!
>
> Other files should not be stored in the same page though - if that's
> happening today, then we have a violation of POSIX, wrong from Linus'
> "quality of implementation" standpoint, and its a security hole.

Sorry, false alarm, I didn't mean to imply that was happening anywhere:
I was just giving a throwaway example of how, though a standard might
say "unspecified", there are still limits to what's allowed - yes,
"quality of implementation" is a good measure.

Hugh

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/