Re: Linux 2.5.70 compile error

[William Lee Irwin III (wli@holomorphy.com)]

At some point in the past, my attribution was stripped from:
>> (1) APIC vs. xAPIC
>> (2) clustered hierarchical DFR vs. flat DFR
>> (3) physical DESTMOD vs. logical DESTMOD in IO-APIC RTE's
>> (4) wakeup via INIT or via NMI
>> (5) physical IPI's or logical IPI's
>> So one could easily form destinations by:

On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 08:28:09AM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> Yes. It's fixable, and I think that's a good project for 2.7, but I really
> don't think that level of change is justified at the moment. Testing this
> stuff is a pain in the ass, it's a lot of work to do properly and carefully.
> And what does that change buy us in reality? Not a lot. 
> I agree it would be nice to do ... just not the focus during a 2.6 
> stabilisation effort, when we have so many other more important things to
> work on, that would have real impact.

Yes, it's 2.7 material.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/