[PATCH] IDE config correctness (was: Linux 2.4.21-rc5)
From: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger (c-d.hailfinger.kernel.2003@gmx.net)
Date: Tue May 27 2003 - 17:39:20 EST
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> Summary of changes from v2.4.21-rc4 to v2.4.21-rc5
> ============================================
>
> Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> o 1: (trivial) Fix the formatting of your ide hack
Darn. Everytime I send a patch for drivers/ide/Config.in, someone beats
me to it and my patch causes a conflict. This time with one more bugfix
for the same line.
Fixes:
CONFIG_PDC202XX_BURST was not selectable if CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PDC202XX_OLD=m
CONFIG_PDC202XX_BURST depended on CONFI_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI, which is a typo.
Please apply,
Carl-Daniel
===== drivers/ide/Config.in 1.32 vs edited =====
--- 1.32/drivers/ide/Config.in Tue May 27 15:24:35 2003
+++ edited/drivers/ide/Config.in Wed May 28 00:28:21 2003
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
dep_tristate ' NS87415 chipset support' CONFIG_BLK_DEV_NS87415 $CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI
dep_tristate ' OPTi 82C621 chipset enhanced support (EXPERIMENTAL)' CONFIG_BLK_DEV_OPTI621 $CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
dep_tristate ' PROMISE PDC202{46|62|65|67} support' CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PDC202XX_OLD $CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI
- dep_bool ' Special UDMA Feature' CONFIG_PDC202XX_BURST $CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PDC202XX_OLD $CONFI_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI
+ dep_mbool ' Special UDMA Feature' CONFIG_PDC202XX_BURST $CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PDC202XX_OLD $CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI
dep_tristate ' PROMISE PDC202{68|69|70|71|75|76|77} support' CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PDC202XX_NEW $CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI
if [ "$CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PDC202XX_OLD" = "y" -o "$CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PDC202XX_OLD" = "m" -o "$CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PDC202XX_NEW" = "y" -o "$CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PDC202XX_NEW" = "m" ]; then
bool ' Special FastTrak Feature' CONFIG_PDC202XX_FORCE