RE: [BUGS] 2.5.69 syncppp

[Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)]

On Sad, 2003-05-24 at 00:11, Paul Fulghum wrote:
> I thought it was in place to serialize state changes.
> I'll look at it harder, you may be right in that
> it is not necessary.

The state serialization doesn't have to be 100% for PPP however,
you already have the same races present due to wire time so I
also think it should be ok.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/