[PATCH] make vt_ioctl ix86isms explicit

From: Christoph Hellwig (hch@lst.de)
Date: Sat May 24 2003 - 12:46:20 EST


sys_ioperm is only implemented on x86 (i386/x86_64). Make the
ifdefs in vt_ioctl.c more explicit so the other architectures can
get rid of their stubs in favour of just using sys_ni_syscall in
the syscall table. (Personally I still wonder why they added it
at all but that's another question..)


--- 1.23/drivers/char/vt_ioctl.c Mon May 12 16:12:47 2003
+++ edited/drivers/char/vt_ioctl.c Fri May 23 21:27:46 2003
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@
*/
unsigned char keyboard_type = KB_101;

-#if !defined(__alpha__) && !defined(__ia64__) && !defined(__mips__) && !defined(__arm__) && !defined(__sh__)
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86
asmlinkage long sys_ioperm(unsigned long from, unsigned long num, int on);
#endif

@@ -424,11 +424,13 @@
ucval = keyboard_type;
goto setchar;

-#if !defined(__alpha__) && !defined(__ia64__) && !defined(__mips__) && !defined(__arm__) && !defined(__sh__)
/*
* These cannot be implemented on any machine that implements
- * ioperm() in user level (such as Alpha PCs).
+ * ioperm() in user level (such as Alpha PCs) or not at all.
+ *
+ * XXX: you should never use these, just call ioperm directly..
*/
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86
case KDADDIO:
case KDDELIO:
/*
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/