Re: [PATCH 4/3] Replace dynamic percpu implementation

From: Rusty Russell (rusty@au1.ibm.com)
Date: Wed May 21 2003 - 19:35:51 EST

Next message: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger: "Re: must-fix list, v5"
Previous message: Rusty Russell: "Re: [patch] futex requeueing feature, futex-requeue-2.5.69-D3"
In reply to: Dipankar Sarma: "Re: [PATCH 4/3] Replace dynamic percpu implementation"
Next in thread: Ravikiran G Thirumalai: "Re: [PATCH 4/3] Replace dynamic percpu implementation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In message <20030521103156.GB2861@in.ibm.com> you write:
> Considering these results, this allocator seems to be a step in the right
> direction.

I had a great chat with David M-T: I'm backing off this until we have
a IA64 code which keeps its current advantages.

If you can find someone to work on the IA64 specific stuff, I think
everyone will be happy.

Cheers!
Rusty.

--
  Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger: "Re: must-fix list, v5"
Previous message: Rusty Russell: "Re: [patch] futex requeueing feature, futex-requeue-2.5.69-D3"
In reply to: Dipankar Sarma: "Re: [PATCH 4/3] Replace dynamic percpu implementation"
Next in thread: Ravikiran G Thirumalai: "Re: [PATCH 4/3] Replace dynamic percpu implementation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 23 2003 - 22:00:47 EST