William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 03:46:01PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
>>Unfortunately "the current policy" is unrealistic, and repeating it
>>doesn't make it any less so.
>
> No contest there; unfortunately unrealistic amounts of work seem to
> be required to get around the general state of affairs at times. =(
> Does it really have to be 2.7? It seems most of this would be header
> reorganization with no runtime impact on the kernel.
>
It is; it doesn't have to be in 2.7 if someone would be willing to step
up and do it in time for 2.6. Personally I wouldn't have a prayer; I'm
already way to deep into too many projects...
-=hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 23 2003 - 22:00:37 EST