On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 11:12:48PM +0200, David Gómez wrote:
> Is there some known problem in 2.4.20 with the e100 driver? I've been seen
> lately a lot of errors in my kernel logs, with the messages:
>
> <31>May 19 09:05:42 kernel: hw tcp v4 csum failed
> <31>May 19 09:11:11 kernel: icmp v4 hw csum failure
>
> repeated several times. I've switched back to the eepro100 driver and the
> checksum errors messages seems to go away...
I get this, too, on two recently-purchased machines. I suspect that
the new revs of the chips are the cause -- my kernel doesn't seem to
know about many of the device IDs on this board:
hrm@cader:~$ lspci
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 2560 (rev 03)
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 2562 (rev 03)
00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 24c2 (rev 02)
00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 24c4 (rev 02)
00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 24c7 (rev 02)
00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 24cd (rev 02)
00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82820 820 (Camino 2) Chipset PCI (rev 82)
00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 24c0 (rev 02)
00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 24cb (rev 02)
00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 24c3 (rev 02)
00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 24c5 (rev 02)
01:08.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 1039 (rev 82)
Other than the odd csum failures (average of 1-2 a day on each
box), it all seems to work perfectly.
Hugo.
--
=== Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk ===
PGP key: 1C335860 from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk
--- ... one ping(1) to rule them all, and in the ---
darkness bind(2) them.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 23 2003 - 22:00:36 EST