Re: need better I/O scheduler for bulk file serving

From: Andrew Morton (akpm@digeo.com)
Date: Sun May 18 2003 - 16:06:42 EST

Next message: Martin Schlemmer: "Re: Recent changes to sysctl.h breaks glibc"
Previous message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: Recent changes to sysctl.h breaks glibc"
In reply to: Felix von Leitner: "need better I/O scheduler for bulk file serving"
Next in thread: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: need better I/O scheduler for bulk file serving"
Reply: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: need better I/O scheduler for bulk file serving"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Felix von Leitner <felix-kernel@fefe.de> wrote:
>
> Larger read-ahead maybe?

Or an anticipatory scheduler. You don't say what kernel you're
using.

We can set the readahead per-fd now, but the fcntl/ioctl hasn't
been implemented.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Martin Schlemmer: "Re: Recent changes to sysctl.h breaks glibc"
Previous message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: Recent changes to sysctl.h breaks glibc"
In reply to: Felix von Leitner: "need better I/O scheduler for bulk file serving"
Next in thread: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: need better I/O scheduler for bulk file serving"
Reply: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: need better I/O scheduler for bulk file serving"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 23 2003 - 22:00:31 EST