In message <20030515.224232.63031915.davem@redhat.com> you write:
> From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
> Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 15:30:36 +1000
>
> D: This patch allows an unlimited number of per-cpu allocations.
>
> Except, of course, on IA64. Maybe I missed the end of some thread,
> but I thought we had all agreed that this kind of limitation was
> a showstopper.
Not breaking IA64 is nice, but it's not an inherent "IA64 can't do it"
thing.
IA64 could just use the generic mechanism, like everyone else. But
they do the tricky 64k mapping thing. As I pointed out, maybe their
decision would have to be rethought if that proves inadaquate.
Cheers,
Rusty.
-- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 23 2003 - 22:00:26 EST