RE: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional

• Next message: Feldman, Scott: "RE: Problem with e100 driver and latency on different packet sizes"
• Previous message: Ingo Oeser: "Re: [PATCH] PAG support, try #2"
• In reply to: Ingo Oeser: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional"
• Next in thread: Ulrich Drepper: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Is this also the case, if I don't want threading at all on my
> system? Does glibc still have a seperate static library for this,
> or should I revert to dietlibc in these cases?

I'm using the most excellent uClibc, which has a configuration option
for POSIX threads.

-ch

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Feldman, Scott: "RE: Problem with e100 driver and latency on different packet sizes"
• Previous message: Ingo Oeser: "Re: [PATCH] PAG support, try #2"
• In reply to: Ingo Oeser: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional"
• Next in thread: Ulrich Drepper: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 15 2003 - 22:00:57 EST