Re: Race between vmtruncate and mapped areas?

From: Andrew Morton (akpm@digeo.com)
Date: Thu May 15 2003 - 03:42:07 EST


Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com> wrote:
>
> So the mm/memory.c part would look something like:

er, right patch, wrong concept. That's the "check i_size after taking
page_table_lock" patch.

It's actually not too bad. Yes, there's 64-bit arith involved, but it is
only a shift.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 15 2003 - 22:00:56 EST