Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> hpa wrote:
>
>
>>How about creating a master option like we have for experimental?
>>Something like "Allow removal of essential components?" (CONFIG_EMBEDDED)
>
>
> ...and that just enables another option: "REALLY allow removal of
> essential components?" (CONFIG_REALLY_EMBEDDED)
>
> :)
Reminds me of CONFIG_MORON back in December 2000
-dep_mbool ' NTFS write support (DANGEROUS)' CONFIG_NTFS_RW
$CONFIG_NTFS_FS $CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
+dep_mbool ' NTFS write support (DANGEROUS)' CONFIG_MORON
$CONFIG_NTFS_FS $CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
+dep_bool ' Are you sure? I hope you dont care about your NTFS
filesystems' CONFIG_NTFS_RW $CONFIG_MORON
;)
Carl-Daniel
-- And the mailer looked at the patch and, behold, it was good. And the mailer decided to wrap the patch.- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 15 2003 - 22:00:54 EST