>>> For the connoisseur, I've attached before/after disassemblies
>>> demonstrating that the if () whose failure is caused by (2) is a very,
>>> very, very real problem.
>
> On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 12:18:57AM -0600, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
>> This was obvious from code inspection.
>
> ISTR a debate where it was claimed the constant would be implicitly
> promoted.
Promotion to long is all that is guaranteed at least up to C89. I
don't think that C99 has changed this. The use of ULL in the code
is required.
-- Justin- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 15 2003 - 22:00:50 EST