On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 04:11:31PM -0700, Zach Brown wrote:
> but on the other hand, this doesn't solve another problem we have with
> opportunistic lock extents and sparse page cache populations. Ideally
> we'd like a FS specific pointer in struct page so we can associate pages
> in the cache with a lock, but I can't imagine suggesting such a thing
> within earshot of wli. so we'd still have to track the dirty offsets to
> avoid having to pass through offsets 0 ... i_size only to find that one
> page in the 8T file that was cached.
Nah, don't worry about sizeof(struct page) anymore; I'll just jack up
PAGE_SIZE to compensate.
-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 15 2003 - 22:00:49 EST