Re: 2.5.69 Interrupt Latency

From: Paul Fulghum (paulkf@microgate.com)
Date: Tue May 13 2003 - 17:39:06 EST

Next message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: Race between vmtruncate and mapped areas?"
Previous message: Dave McCracken: "Re: Race between vmtruncate and mapped areas?"
In reply to: Bill Davidsen: "Re: 2.5.69 Interrupt Latency"
Next in thread: Alan Stern: "Test Patch: 2.5.69 Interrupt Latency"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 2003-05-13 at 15:17, Bill Davidsen wrote:

> 2 - if you don't use USB why not just take the driver out?

Because a driver that runs amok, silently causing
interrupt latency problems, becomes a real support
nightmare for others.

> It would be nice to prevent the problem, of course.

Agreed

-- Paul Fulghum, paulkf@microgate.com Microgate Corporation, http://www.microgate.com

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: Race between vmtruncate and mapped areas?"
Previous message: Dave McCracken: "Re: Race between vmtruncate and mapped areas?"
In reply to: Bill Davidsen: "Re: 2.5.69 Interrupt Latency"
Next in thread: Alan Stern: "Test Patch: 2.5.69 Interrupt Latency"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 15 2003 - 22:00:49 EST