Re: [PATCH] fix net/rxrpc/proc.c

From: $B5HF#1QL@(
Date: Mon May 12 2003 - 22:13:53 EST

Next message: Chris Wright: "Re: [PATCH] Early init for security modules"
Previous message: Chris Wright: "Re: [PATCH] Early init for security modules"
In reply to: Chris Wright: "Re: [PATCH] fix net/rxrpc/proc.c"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] fix net/rxrpc/proc.c"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In article <20030512200530.I19432@figure1.int.wirex.com> (at Mon, 12 May 2003 20:05:30 -0700), Chris Wright <chris@wirex.com> says:

> * YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@?(B (yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org) wrote:
> >
> > Sorry, it's my mistake. David, please apply his patch.
>
> Thanks, sorry, I should have Cc:'d you in the first place, my apology.
> Seems like the rxrpc_proc_calls_fops should get an owner as well? (relative
> to the last patch)

Yes. Thanks for pointing out.

-- 
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF  80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Chris Wright: "Re: [PATCH] Early init for security modules"
Previous message: Chris Wright: "Re: [PATCH] Early init for security modules"
In reply to: Chris Wright: "Re: [PATCH] fix net/rxrpc/proc.c"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] fix net/rxrpc/proc.c"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 15 2003 - 22:00:43 EST