Re: [PATCH] fix net/rxrpc/proc.c

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Mon May 12 2003 - 20:49:18 EST

Next message: dave young: "(no subject)"
Previous message: zhangtao: "[PATCH] NLS Codepage 936 - Part 2"
In reply to: Chris Wright: "[PATCH] fix net/rxrpc/proc.c"
Next in thread: Chris Wright: "Re: [PATCH] fix net/rxrpc/proc.c"
Reply: Chris Wright: "Re: [PATCH] fix net/rxrpc/proc.c"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 2003-05-12 at 17:38, Chris Wright wrote:
> A recent change in 2.5.69-bk from Yoshfuji broke compilation of rxrpc
> code. It erroneously adds an owner field to the rxrpc_proc_peers_ops
> seq_operations. Fix below.

Why is it "erroneous"? Just add the proper linux/module.h include
to net/rxrpc/proc.c instead of spewing baseless claims.

-- 
David S. Miller <davem@redhat.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: dave young: "(no subject)"
Previous message: zhangtao: "[PATCH] NLS Codepage 936 - Part 2"
In reply to: Chris Wright: "[PATCH] fix net/rxrpc/proc.c"
Next in thread: Chris Wright: "Re: [PATCH] fix net/rxrpc/proc.c"
Reply: Chris Wright: "Re: [PATCH] fix net/rxrpc/proc.c"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 15 2003 - 22:00:42 EST