Re: Two RAID1 mirrors are faster than three

From: Chuck Ebbert (76306.1226@compuserve.com)
Date: Mon May 12 2003 - 11:32:16 EST


Clemens Schwaighofer wrote:

> Why three drives in a Raid1? Raid one is just mirror, or is the third
> drive like a "hot" replace drive if one of the others fail?

  The goal is to get better (read) performance, as well as extra
redundancy. The system is supposed to balance reads among the
available drives but in this case it breaks when there are more
than two disks.

  I have a "changes way too much code" patch that fixes this; guess
I should at least post it and see what happens...

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 15 2003 - 22:00:40 EST