"William" == William Lee Irwin, <William> writes:
William> Not at all. Just stamp at wakeup and difference when it runs.
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 03:04:09PM +1000, Peter Chubb wrote:
> That then doesn't include interrupt latency. The nice thing about the
> amlat tests is that the test predicts when the next interrupt should
> occur, then measures the time between that prediction and the process
> running in userspace. If you just timestamp at wakeup, you miss all
> the time between interrupt generation and noticing that the process is
> to wake up.
Of course. But that is not the scheduler's problem.
-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 15 2003 - 22:00:38 EST