Re: Problem: strace -ff fails on 2.4.21-rc1

From: Bernhard Kaindl (bernhard.kaindl@gmx.de)
Date: Sun May 11 2003 - 18:50:01 EST


On Sun, 11 May 2003, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> > Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> > > I just found out minicom is spawing /sbin/lockdev which is setgrp
> > > 'lock'. Would that cause ptrace failure??
> >
> > AFAIK that could have caused the failure. Please test 2.4.21-rc2 whcih
> > has fixes for many ptrace problems.
>
> I can now strace minicom and its children with 2.4.21-rc2-ac1 but it
> hangs on exit. Both child processes exit successfully:

Very strange, does this work with 2.4.20? What's your version of strace?

> However strace and minicom are hung up somehow and the screen is
> black with a blinking cursor at row 1 column 1. The other ttys all
> work OK and killing minicom cleans everything up.

Hm, this sounds like there could be some error/loop opening the device,
which could be the effect of another side effect of the original ptrace
fix, which my fixes which are included in 2.4.21-rc2 don't fix.

This side effect causes that if a system call needs a module loaded,
it is not loaded and only an error from request_module() is sent to
the kernel log. The attached patch on top of 2.4.21-rc2, fixes this
remaining problem.

I'm not writing much info about it now, except that I think that it does
not open any securiy hole, but I would like to give it a little more
testing on SMP machines. On single CPU it fixed the "modprobe rejected"
problem fine for me, without sacrifying ptrace securitey.

I'm uncertain if it would help in your case.

In your first message, you wrote:

> (BTW does minicom work for you on 2.5? It fails with the "No child
> processes" message on 2.5.6x here but works on 2.4 when it's not being
> traced. Just the very act of running it under strace on 2.4 makes it
> fail the same way it does on 2.5 here. And stracing it on 2.5.66 made
> it start working again! Something very strange is going on...)

Very strange, maybe a "tail minicom.trc.*" at the time when it's hanging
helps to get some idea.

Another note: suid is ignored when you are tracing the task which runs
exec() for a setuid program.

So if minicom relies on having the setgid gid of /sbin/lockdev honored
has in your case, the only ways I can find to get it working inder strace are:

- Change the locking config (temporary, for the debug) so that /sbin/lockdev
  does not need to be setgid.

- Don't have ptrace follow fork mode activated when forking the child
  which exec()'s /sbin/lockdev.

Bernd


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 15 2003 - 22:00:37 EST