Followup to: <20030510033504.GA1789@zip.com.au>
By author: CaT <cat@zip.com.au>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> On Sat, May 10, 2003 at 04:56:34AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Extensive discussion by various experts on the discuss@x86-64.org
> > mailing list concluded that the correct vector to restart an 286+
> > CPU is f000:fff0, not ffff:0000. Both seem to work on current systems,
> > but the first is correct.
>
> Could this bug, by any chance, cause a system to shutdown instead of
> rebooting? This is what happens to me at the moment but not each and
> every time.
>
No, it wouldn't.
-hpa
-- <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." Architectures needed: ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 15 2003 - 22:00:33 EST