Re: [PATCH]: DELAYTIMER_MAX is defined

From: Ulrich Drepper (drepper@redhat.com)
Date: Wed May 07 2003 - 14:03:35 EST


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

george anzinger wrote:
> Andrew Morton suggested
> an rlimit for that. Perhaps that is what should be used here also.
>
> Seem reasonable?

For this as well? We are getting an awful lot of these it seems.

The DELAYTIMER_MAX thing probably can be hardcoded. I can see no harm
in limiting it to 1000 or so. The number of timers can be handled via
rlimit.

- --
- --------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+uViH2ijCOnn/RHQRApl3AKC6l4zZMsn7SaiGSw6hb9KZpc5cQACgm1NW
09sC2WWGZsw1QAUxcTjo8rI=
=Nafv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 07 2003 - 22:00:32 EST