Re: [PATCH] kmalloc_percpu

From: Andrew Morton (akpm@digeo.com)
Date: Wed May 07 2003 - 00:37:51 EST


Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
>
> I figured that since the allocator is going to be there anyway, it
> made sense to express kmalloc_percpu() in those terms. If you think
> the price is too high, I can respect that.

I suggest that we use your new mechanism to fix DEFINE_PERCPU() in modules,
and leave kmalloc_percpu() as it is for now.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 07 2003 - 22:00:30 EST