Grover, Andrew wrote:
> Ohhh so we need to not just return nonzero, but return 1 (aka
> IRQ_HANDLED?) Well, then this makes sense. Sorry about that.
>
> btw I think the line in handle_IRQ_event that reads
>
> if (retval != 1) {
>
> should be
>
> if (retval != IRQ_HANDLED) {
Then I must further nit-pick: if IRQ_HANDLED is considered "non-zero"
the above test should be against IRQ_NONE, to avoid directly considering
any single value _the_ non-zero value...
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 07 2003 - 22:00:28 EST