From: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 22:02:50 -0700
"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> wrote:
> Andrew's example with some module doing kmalloc_percpu() inside
> of fops->open() is just rediculious.
crap. Modules deal with per-device and per-mount objects. If a module
cannot use kmalloc_per_cpu on behalf of the primary object which it manages
then the facility is simply not useful to modules.
Ok then.
Please address the ia64 concerns then :-) It probably means we
have to stay with the dereferencing stuff... at which point you
might as well use normal kmalloc() and smp_processor_id() indexing
inside of modules.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 07 2003 - 22:00:24 EST