On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 10:54:20PM +0200, Stian Jordet wrote:
>
> I have read somewhere that the USB device not accepting new address
> means that the host-controller doesn't get an interrupt, and that this
> often is because of ACPI. It's just the same with acpi disabled (and in
> 2.5.68 it did work with and without acpi).
Hm, can you look at /proc/interrups and verify that the usb controller's
interrupt count is going up? It really sounds like the interrupt isn't
getting through to the usb controller driver.
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 07 2003 - 22:00:23 EST