No, on bk11 it does the same thing.
On Sat, 3 May 2003, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, May 03, 2003 at 03:55:12PM +0300, Andrei Ivanov wrote:
> > usb 1-2: USB device not accepting new address=2 (error=-110)
> > hub 1-0:0: new USB device on port 2, assigned address 3
> > usb 1-2: USB device not accepting new address=3 (error=-110)
>
> Hm, interrupts aren't getting to the usb host controller. Does this
> work ok on the latest -bk tree for you?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 07 2003 - 22:00:19 EST