> On 2 May 2003, James Bottomley wrote:
>>
>> I'm not asking for any changes to the way you do 2.4, just for 2.5 where
>> we have no vendor versions to support and there should only be a single
>> tree.
>
> The way the backwards-compatibility is _meant_ to work is that a driver
> can just do this:
>
> #ifndef IRQ_RETVAL
> typedef void irqreturn_t;
> #define IRQ_NONE
> #define IRQ_HANDLED
> #define IRQ_RETVAL(x)
> #endif
I switched the drivers to using this yesterday.
#ifndef IRQ_RETVAL
typedef void irqreturn_t;
#define IRQ_RETVAL(x)
#endif
Updated BK send and tar files are here:
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~gibbs/linux/SRC/
-- Justin- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 07 2003 - 22:00:19 EST