Kmt Sundqvist <rabbit80@mbnet.fi> wrote:
>
> > Kimmo Sundqvist <rabbit80@mbnet.fi> wrote:
>
> >> May 2 20:34:10 minjami kernel: irq 19: nobody cared!
>
> > Very odd. How often does this happen?
>
> Actually I was booting up for the first time with -mm4 as it happened.
> The first 8 errors I copied verbatim, and the 22 that happened after the
> 8th but before the machine locked up I left out. So my guess is that
> whatever happened there, happened every time.
Well I don't see anything wrong in there, but this should shut it up for you.
diff -puN drivers/net/3c59x.c~3c59x-irq-fix drivers/net/3c59x.c
--- 25/drivers/net/3c59x.c~3c59x-irq-fix 2003-05-03 14:39:17.000000000 -0700
+++ 25-akpm/drivers/net/3c59x.c 2003-05-03 14:39:50.000000000 -0700
@@ -2321,7 +2321,6 @@ boomerang_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_i
long ioaddr;
int status;
int work_done = max_interrupt_work;
- int handled;
ioaddr = dev->base_addr;
@@ -2336,18 +2335,14 @@ boomerang_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_i
if (vortex_debug > 6)
printk(KERN_DEBUG "boomerang_interrupt. status=0x%4x\n", status);
- if ((status & IntLatch) == 0) {
- handled = 0;
+ if ((status & IntLatch) == 0)
goto handler_exit; /* No interrupt: shared IRQs can cause this */
- }
if (status == 0xffff) { /* h/w no longer present (hotplug)? */
if (vortex_debug > 1)
printk(KERN_DEBUG "boomerang_interrupt(1): status = 0xffff\n");
- handled = 0;
goto handler_exit;
}
- handled = 1;
if (status & IntReq) {
status |= vp->deferred;
@@ -2442,7 +2437,7 @@ boomerang_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_i
dev->name, status);
handler_exit:
spin_unlock(&vp->lock);
- return IRQ_RETVAL(handled);
+ return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
static int vortex_rx(struct net_device *dev)
_
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 07 2003 - 22:00:18 EST