Re: [PATCH] alternative compat_ioctl table implementation

From: Arnd Bergmann (arnd@arndb.de)
Date: Fri May 02 2003 - 16:42:04 EST


On Friday 02 May 2003 20:09, Andi Kleen wrote:

> Rather ugly. In my experience all vmlinux.lds hacks are very fragile
> and they break when you just look at them in the wrong way. Also when
> something goes wrong they are a bitch to debug. And binutils is not
> exactly known for not introducing bugs with new releases.
Ok.

> Can't you work around that gcc 2.95 bug in some other way ?
Yes. I noticed now that only the x86_64 code (from which I copied)
contains the assembly version that breaks on cross-compile
and the sparc64 version works fine.

        Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 07 2003 - 22:00:17 EST