Re: [RFC][PATCH] Faster generic_fls

From: Lincoln Dale (ltd@cisco.com)
Date: Thu May 01 2003 - 19:13:40 EST


At 03:52 PM 1/05/2003 +0200, Willy TARREAU wrote:
>Ok, I recoded the tree myself with if/else, and it's now faster than all
>others,
[..]
>4294967295 iterations of nil... checksum = 4294967295
>4294967295 iterations of old... checksum = 4294967265
>4294967295 iterations of new... checksum = 4294967265
>4294967295 iterations of fls_table... checksum = 4294967264
>4294967295 iterations of fls_tree... checksum = 4294967265

yep - faster - but with different results.
shouldn't the checksums be the same????

cheers,

lincoln.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 07 2003 - 22:00:14 EST