Re: Kernel source tree splitting

From: Balram Adlakha (b_adlakha@softhome.net)
Date: Thu May 01 2003 - 12:22:38 EST


On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 07:54:03AM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> Martin J. Bligh wrote:
>
> >> So there are many edits that needed to be done in lots of
> >> Kconfig and Makefiles if one selectively pulls or omits certain
> >> sub-directories.
> >
> > Indeed, I ran across the same thing a while back. Would be *really* nice to
> > fix, if only so some poor sod over a modem can download a smaller tarball,
> > or save some diskspace.
>
> I have seven source trees on disk right now. Getting rid off all
> the archs but i386 would not only save tons of space, it would also
> make 'grep -r' go faster and stop spewing irrelevant hits for archs
> that I couldn't care less about.
>
>
> ------
> Chuck
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

I agree with you. Making different trees for different archs will make the tarball much smaller. Usually people only use one architecture and the other code lies waste. I think this has been discussed many times but It really is worth doing.

-- 


- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 07 2003 - 22:00:13 EST