From: Steven Whitehouse <steve@gw.chygwyn.com>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 15:04:00 +0100 (BST)
> About update_pmtu(). You are not required to implement this.
> All of these places you see dereferencing dst->update_mtu()
> know that they have an ipv4/ipv6 route. Or do you know some
> exception to this?
I was thinking of that bit of code in ip_gre.c which I sent the fix for
recently. Unless I've missed something it calls update_pmtu on the dst
which is passed by the encapsulated protocol, although I've not actually
tested that.
Thats the reason I wasn't sure about the fix which I sent... it deleted the
duplicated call only for IPv4 rather than the one which appears to get called
for every protocol as I wasn't sure what was intended.
No, this must be an IPV4 or an IPV6 route.
Right Alexey?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 07 2003 - 22:00:13 EST