Re: [RFC] clustered apic irq affinity fix for i386

From: Arjan van de Ven (arjan@fenrus.demon.nl)
Date: Thu May 01 2003 - 04:10:54 EST

Next message: Willy Tarreau: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Faster generic_fls"
Previous message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: Why DRM exists [was Re: Flame Linus to a crisp!]"
Next in thread: Keith Mannthey: "Re: [RFC] clustered apic irq affinity fix for i386"
Maybe reply: Keith Mannthey: "Re: [RFC] clustered apic irq affinity fix for i386"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 2003-05-01 at 01:36, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Keith Mannthey <kmannth@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello all,
> > Machines with clustered apics are buggy when it comes to setting irq
> > affinity.
>
> You stand accused of crimes against whitespace.

The final verdict is: guilty. The punishment will consist of being
forced to read the sourcecode of indent for one hour.

application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Willy Tarreau: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Faster generic_fls"
Previous message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: Why DRM exists [was Re: Flame Linus to a crisp!]"
Next in thread: Keith Mannthey: "Re: [RFC] clustered apic irq affinity fix for i386"
Maybe reply: Keith Mannthey: "Re: [RFC] clustered apic irq affinity fix for i386"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 07 2003 - 22:00:12 EST