Re: [PATCH] add a stub by which a module can bind to the AFS syscall

• Next message: Larry McVoy: "Re: Why DRM exists [was Re: Flame Linus to a crisp!]"
• Previous message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Faster generic_fls"
• In reply to: David Howells: "[PATCH] add a stub by which a module can bind to the AFS syscall"
• Next in thread: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] add a stub by which a module can bind to the AFS syscall"
• Reply: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] add a stub by which a module can bind to the AFS syscall"
• Reply: chas williams: "Re: [PATCH] add a stub by which a module can bind to the AFS syscall"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 02:44:54PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
>
> Hi Linus,
>
> This patch makes it possible for a module to bind safely to the AFS syscall,
> without having to modify the syscall table directly.

Umm, you're adding a handler so that a module can register a variadic
multiplexer syscall?? I think you need to rething your design..
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Larry McVoy: "Re: Why DRM exists [was Re: Flame Linus to a crisp!]"
• Previous message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Faster generic_fls"
• In reply to: David Howells: "[PATCH] add a stub by which a module can bind to the AFS syscall"
• Next in thread: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] add a stub by which a module can bind to the AFS syscall"
• Reply: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] add a stub by which a module can bind to the AFS syscall"
• Reply: chas williams: "Re: [PATCH] add a stub by which a module can bind to the AFS syscall"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 30 2003 - 22:00:35 EST