Re: [Motion] Re: IDE corruption during heavy bt878-induced interr upt load [LKM]

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Wed Apr 23 2003 - 17:11:16 EST

Next message: Andries Brouwer: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.67-ac2 direct-IO for IDE taskfile ioctl (0/4)"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.67-ac2 direct-IO for IDE taskfile ioctl (0/4)"
In reply to: joe briggs: "Re: [Motion] Re: IDE corruption during heavy bt878-induced interr upt load [LKM]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mer, 2003-04-23 at 23:13, joe briggs wrote:
> Is this true??? Does onboard IDE controllers appear and work the same way as
> IDE or PCI controllers with respect to IRQ, DMA, and memory access?

They appear to. Most of them nowdays are wired directly to the
north/southbridge link for performance.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andries Brouwer: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.67-ac2 direct-IO for IDE taskfile ioctl (0/4)"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.67-ac2 direct-IO for IDE taskfile ioctl (0/4)"
In reply to: joe briggs: "Re: [Motion] Re: IDE corruption during heavy bt878-induced interr upt load [LKM]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 23 2003 - 22:00:39 EST