Re: [PATCH] Extended Attributes for Security Modules against 2.5.68

From: Stephen Smalley (sds@epoch.ncsc.mil)
Date: Wed Apr 23 2003 - 13:59:27 EST

Next message: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4.20 - intel AGP update (rev 3)"
Previous message: Jörn Engel: "Re: [Bug 623] New: Volume not remembered."
In reply to: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] Extended Attributes for Security Modules against 2.5.68"
Next in thread: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] Extended Attributes for Security Modules against 2.5.68"
Reply: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] Extended Attributes for Security Modules against 2.5.68"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 2003-04-23 at 14:42, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> No. It's not acceptable that the same ondisk structure has a different
> meaning depending on loaded modules. If the xattrs have a different
> meaning they _must_ have a different name.

Again, I'd suggest that you read the original discussion thread.

-- Stephen Smalley <sds@epoch.ncsc.mil> National Security Agency

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4.20 - intel AGP update (rev 3)"
Previous message: Jörn Engel: "Re: [Bug 623] New: Volume not remembered."
In reply to: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] Extended Attributes for Security Modules against 2.5.68"
Next in thread: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] Extended Attributes for Security Modules against 2.5.68"
Reply: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] Extended Attributes for Security Modules against 2.5.68"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 23 2003 - 22:00:38 EST