Re: [PATCH] kdevt-diff

From: Pavel Machek (pavel@ucw.cz)
Date: Wed Apr 23 2003 - 10:19:20 EST


Hi!

> > > Linus, if you still want to go for a single block device major, this patch
> > > is bad idea (at least in this form).
> >
> > I disagree.
>
> Ok, here is a compromise proposal. I don't care very much about the MKDEV
> macro and almost nobody else should care about it either.
> My main concern with a larger dev_t is that people start to go wild and
> waste the number range with crap. So what I'd like to see is some usage
> policy, e.g. nobody should assume a certain dev_t size, so that it's still
> possible to scale it down. If the user has only a small number of devices,
> they should be addressable even with a 16 bit dev_t.

What's the point? Its not like 8 bytes are that much... Your "number
range" is essentially free, and its okay to waste it...
                                                                        Pavel

-- 
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 23 2003 - 22:00:36 EST